In an earlier post, I mentioned that a lot of recent work in experimental philosophy seems to be moving toward a new view about the way people ordinarily attribute conscious states. This view says that people have certain special criteria for determining that an entity is capable of phenomenal consciousness (as distinguished from other kinds of mental states) and that these criteria have something to do with whether or not the entity has a body.
As Adam points out in the comments there, Arico, Fiala, Goldberg & Nichols now have a new paper challenging this emerging view. They suggest that people do not in fact have special criteria for phenomenal consciousness in particular. Instead, people simply have general criteria for attributing AGENCY. Then, once people have determined that an entity counts as an AGENT, they immediately attribute to it all of the various sorts of mental states they might attribute to a human being.
The paper itself includes not only a lot of complex theoretical argument but also an exciting new reaction time study that examines the speed at which subjects can decide whether a given entity is capable of having a given type of state. In my view, this new methodology provides an extremely powerful way of getting at subjects' immediate intuitions about consciousness (even in cases where those immediate intuitions are then overruled by subsequent reflection).
Recent Comments